I know most attorneys are ethical, but do you think unethical attorneys would be more likely to ask an independent paralegal that they do not work with on a regular basis to do something unethical than they would a regular employee? If so would it also be true the other way around? Would an independent paralegal be more willing to do something unethical for the business, or would they be more on guard? ~ Curious Paralegal Student
The hypothetical you’ve raised is interesting. Without having any actual data, but having worked in the legal field for over 25 years, I’d have to opine that an unethical attorney is likely not going to differentiate between employees and freelance paralegals.
But I’d think an unethical attorney would look for untrained and uninformed employees if he needed a cohort in misconduct. Any paralegal that knows the ethics rules is going to know what constitutes misconduct, but some paralegals may be caught between a rock and a hard place if their sole source of income rests on a supervising attorney who’s willing to bend or break the rules to suit his needs. So, maybe an unethical attorney would also look for someone that is vulnerable and whose financial needs will make her more malleable.
As for flipping it to the other side, again I don’t think an independent paralegal is any more or less likely to breach ethics rules than anyone else. But someone with insufficient training, inadequate supervision, poor judgment and/or purely financial motivation would probably be more willing to participate in an act of misconduct, knowingly or unknowingly.
Readers, what say you?